Description
Abstract: "Do different forms of uncertainty account for different procedural fairness effects? We hypothesized that general uncertainty accounts for fairness judgments, whereas belongingness uncertainty accounts for group identification. Experiment 1 manipulated general versus belongingness uncertainty. Participants in the general uncertainty condition regarded the procedures as fairer when they were granted than denied voice, whereas participants in the belongingness uncertainty condition showed stronger group identification when they were granted than denied voice. Experiment 2 split the belongingness uncertainty condition into family and stranger uncertainty. Only participants in the family-belongingness uncertainty condition identified with their group when they were granted than denied voice. The findings have implications for the construct of uncertainty, models of procedural fairness, and group membership." [authors abstract] (Description from external book data)
6 similar books linked from this page.
Offers
Currently unavailable
There are no swap offers for this book right now.
Only Offers/Searches from registered users with name will be displayed. Set up a name here to see your offers.
Rate/Setting
Please log in to rate or offer books. Log in
Offer this book
Log in to add your own offer, choose the format and describe delivery options.
More to discover
Find more books by this author, in this category or in the same language.